The Indian Democratic Behemoth
The latest controversy surrounding electoral bonds in India involves several key developments. India’s Supreme Court has ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose details of the electoral bonds scheme, which allowed anonymous political donations. The court struck down the scheme as “unconstitutional” and has given SBI a strict timeline to comply with its order. SBI sought an extension until June 30th, 2024 to provide detailed information about the bonds but was denied by the Supreme Court. The bank is required to disclose details of bond purchasers and the amounts redeemed by political parties. These events have sparked significant debate and concern over transparency and the influence of anonymous donations in Indian politics.
The 2019 general elections in
India were estimated to be one of the most expensive elections ever. According
to a report by the Centre for Media Studies, the total expenditure was about Rs
60,000 crore (approximately USD 8 billion), with BJP accounting for
nearly 45% of the total poll spending. This significant
expenditure reflects the scale and intensity of the electoral process in the
world’s largest democracy. If you logically think about it, this money is the
public money spent to choose a political party and a leader to rule the country
for 5 years and during this period again get ready for the next election.
Elections are a cornerstone of
democracy, yet the escalating costs year after year set a higher financial
benchmark for subsequent polls. I believe that India’s election funding system
requires a profound overhaul in its approach. To substantiate my viewpoint, I
will present some figures that should convince any rational individual of the
severe misalignment between our democratic journey and the spiralling election
expenses.
Numbers don’t lie:
Absolute Majority is a myth? Percentage of vote share since 1951 elections, the highest has
been 48.12% in 1984-85 by INC with 414 seats. In the very
first general election, the INC won only 364 seats with a 44.99% vote
share. In 2014, the BJP the largest winner won, 282 seats with a vote
share of only 31.34%. In 2019, the BJP improved the tally of total numbers
and vote shares to 303 and 37.7% respectively. So, in the 75+ years of
democracy in India, no party has won more than 414 seats and more than 48.12% vote
share ever. So, how do the rest of the people who did not vote for a particular party
or leader, who was not elected, get their desires and wishes fulfilled?
Political Parties for Power? In 1951-52 general elections, 53 political parties contested the
election. That number has grown to 673 parties in the 2019 general election.
The number of parties has grown more than ten times, this only means that more
votes are getting split into smaller segments of parties. Though the rise of number
parties means more local voices are getting some kind of representation at the same
time these smaller splinters are not making enough dent at the national level.
More parties also mean a greater number of politicians fighting for the same
number of seats which again splitting the votes shares. If we have to bring
more accountability to our central leadership, there has to be some radical
rethinking needed, otherwise, we will build more inefficiencies in the democratic system.
Politics for Profit? In the 2014 and 2019 General elections, per parliamentary constituency on average 15 candidates were fielded by the political parties. In 2014 there
were 189 constituencies where 16 or more candidates fought one PC seat. What is
atrocious is in 2019, Nizamabad of Telangana had 185 candidates for one single
PC seat. In 2019, that number came down slightly to 163 (still contributing to
30%). Very clearly politics is a very profitable profession for many of our politicians
and political parties. In total 8045 candidates fought for the 2019 general
election for a total of 543 seats. There is something seriously wrong with the
way, we are progressing in the democratic election process. It seems every
political party is simply ignoring this and just focusing on the next election
win.
Expenditure shooting the roof? The
initial cap on election spending, established during the first General
Elections in 1952, remained unchanged for the next three elections in 1957,
1962, and 1967. It wasn’t until 1971, nearly two decades later, that the
expenditure ceiling was raised for the first time to reflect the growing
constituencies and electorate. Since then, the spending limit for candidates
has been revised multiple times, taking into account factors such as the
increasing number of voters, the cost inflation index, and changes in
constituency geography as recommended by the Delimitation Commission. At the
start of 2022, the cap was updated again to consider these factors and the rise
of virtual campaigning. The most recent amendment to Rule 90 of the Conduct of
Elections Rules, 1961, issued by the Ministry of Law & Justice on January
6, 2022, sets the current limit between Rs. 75 Lakhs and Rs. 95 Lakhs per
Parliamentary Constituency. These are only the official figures, the actual on-ground expenditure is at least 7 to 10 times higher per candidate. We saw
earlier in this article; that the total expenditure of the 2019 elections was Rs. 60,000
crores by 8045 candidates, so per candidate the average is Rs. 7.46
crore.
Regional Parties Gaining Ground? Since 1996 regional parties have won at least 100 or more seats in every
general election. The growth of regional parties in India may be able to truly sustain
the federal fabric of our democracy. But unless some structural reforms are
done in our constitution, it would be very difficult for the regional parties
to sustain the onslaught of the major national parties. For example, at the state assembly level, only the regional parties of the state should contest the election. This
may sound very simplistic or radical but if done constructively can
reap a lot of benefits to strengthen the federal fabric of our democracy. But is
this too little and too late?
Opaque election funding is the biggest source of corruption in India
today. Just imagine Rs. 60,000/- crore worth of money spent in 2019. Where do
think this comes from? Well, the political parties are not in any business,
they simply depend on donors to support them. In return, the donors are
supported back with contracts, favours etc post the election by the winning
leader and political party.
Here are some radical thoughts,
that need the political will and constitutional blessings to protect the
future of India’s democratic process.
Individual Tax Rebate for
Political Donations: Consider allowing political donations made by
individuals to serve as a substitute for income tax payments. For instance, if
an individual donates Rs. 20,000 to a political party, they should receive a
corresponding income tax rebate. This approach encourages transparent political
funding and empowers taxpayers to contribute to India’s democratic processes.
To prevent abuse, individual contributions could be capped as a percentage of
their income.
Corporate Donations and
Tax Rebates: Large corporations could follow a similar model. Their
donations might be tied to a percentage of their profits, ensuring that no
business entity gains undue advantage within the political system. Recognizing
these contributions through tax rebates would further promote transparency.
Stringent Expenditure
Disclosure: Implement stricter expenditure disclosure requirements at
the individual leader level. When leaders are transparent about their spending,
political parties are likely to follow suit.
Two-Phase Elections for
Efficiency: In constituencies with more than three candidates,
consider a two-phase election process. First, eliminate candidates with lower
vote shares, leaving only the top three contenders. In the second phase, these
top candidates compete, maximizing the actual winner’s vote percentage. This
approach reduces the number of candidates in future elections and curtails
overall campaign expenses.
Comments
Post a Comment